Which of these options aligns with identifying potential conflicts in security roles?

Identifying potential conflicts in security roles is primarily addressed through the concept of segregation of duties. Segregation of duties (SoD) is a fundamental internal control designed to prevent errors and fraud by ensuring that no individual has control over all aspects of a financial transaction. By assessing potential conflicts, organizations can identify situations where an individual has conflicting responsibilities that could lead to misuse or errors.

In this context, the choice that focuses specifically on potential conflicts within security roles would be associated with segregation of duties. This approach helps organizations pinpoint specific areas where overlapping responsibilities could create vulnerabilities, ensuring that the design of roles and access rights effectively addresses and mitigates those risks.

The other options, while relevant to security and compliance in different ways, do not specifically focus on identifying conflicts within security roles. For instance, an action summary for security groups provides an overview of user actions but doesn’t inherently assess conflicts. Similarly, viewing security for a securable item relates more to examining permissions and access but doesn’t specifically analyze conflicting roles. A security compliance checklist is also a broader tool used to ensure overall compliance but does not focus solely on the identification of conflicts within security roles.